Reasoning about Knowledge and Belief

نویسنده

  • Yoram Moses
چکیده

An agent operating in a complex environment can benefit from adapting its behavior to the situation at hand. The agent's choice of actions at any point in time can, however , be based only on its local knowledge and beliefs. When many agents are present, the success of one's agent's actions will typically depend on the actions of the other agents. These, in turn, are based on the other agents' own knowledge and beliefs. It follows that to operate effectively in a setting containing other agents, an agent must, in addition to its knowledge about the physical features of the outside world, consider its knowledge about other agent's knowledge. This line of reasoning can be extended to justify the need for using deeper levels of knowledge, of course. Moreover, the task of obtaining relevant knowledge and that of affecting the knowledge of other agents, become important goals in many applications. This crucial connection between knowledge and action is what makes knowledge and belief two of the most frequently used notions in everyday discourse. It also suggests that rigorous frameworks for reasoning about knowledge and belief can be of value when analyzing scenarios involving multiple agents. Philosophers have been concerned with epistemology, the study of knowledge, for thousands of years, going back to the great Chinese, Greek, and Indian thinkers. The focus of much of their analysis was on fundamental questions about the nature of knowledge: What can be known? When does someone know something? How does knowledge relate to truth and to belief? Rigorous logical treatment of knowledge and belief go back to the work of von Wright in the 1950's. It gained substantial grounding in Hintikka's seminal book Knowledge and Belief in 1962 [28], which based modal logics of knowledge on Kripke's possible-worlds semantic modeling of modal logics [30]. Hintikka's work was followed by a wave of research in the 1960's on logics for knowledge and belief and their proper axiomatizations, with a focus on the relationship between knowledge and belief [15, 31]. In the second half of the Twentieth century, researchers in different fields of science recognized the need to understand the role that knowledge and belief play in multi-agent systems and multi-agent interaction. In 1969, David K. Lewis published 622 15. Reasoning about Knowledge and Belief the book Conventions, which contained the first explicit definition of common knowledge among a set of agents (or individuals). Extensions of …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Outcome Knowledge and False Belief

Virtually every social interaction involves reasoning about the perspectives of others, or 'theory of mind (ToM).' Previous research suggests that it is difficult to ignore our current knowledge when reasoning about a more naïve perspective (i.e., the curse of knowledge). In this Mini Review, we discuss the implications of the curse of knowledge for certain aspects of ToM. Particularly, we exam...

متن کامل

Consistent Belief Reasoning in the Presence of Inconsistency

Since everything is a consequence of an inconsistency, classical logics are not useful in modeling the reasoning of an agent who has inconsistent beliefs. In this paper, we differentiate consistent beliefs from inconsistent beliefs. We propose two belief operators B c and B, standing for consistent belief and belief, respectively. B c has the modus ponens property, by which the agent is able to...

متن کامل

Reasoning about Autonomy in Multi-Agent Systems

A domain-independent approach to reasoning about the autonomy level of agent goals is presented. The approach is based on general representations of knowledge about goals and resources. A hybrid two-stage reasoning process is proposed, consisting of a belief net and a case-based reasoner. Belief nets are examined in detail as a mechanism for establishing the basic autonomy level of an agent for a

متن کامل

CHANGING MINDS ABOUT BELIEF REVISION Changing Minds by Reasoning About Belief Revision: A Challenge for Cognitive Systems

In this paper, we explore the representational and inferential requirements for supporting a rich notion of belief revision. Our analysis extends beyond the typical case of a single agent revising its beliefs in light of new information into the realm of social engagement. More to the point, we argue that although belief revision mechanisms surely operate at the level of single agents, we must ...

متن کامل

Remote Belief: Preserving Volition for Loosely Coupled Processes

Knowledge has proven to be a useful and fundamental formalism for reasoning about distributed systems. The application of this formalism, however, entails a loss of volition on the part of processes about which something is known. This loss of volition is often not appropriate in loosely coupled distributed systems. In this paper, we generalize the formal characterization of knowledge into one ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008